This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0011128707308857v1 54/4/560    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Leiber, M. J. Articles by Johnson, J. D. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Being Young and Black: What Are Their Effects on Juvenile Justice Decision Making?

¹ Virginia Commonweatlh University
² Michigan State University

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: mjleiber{at}vcu.edu.

	Abstract

This study examined the extent to which race and age individually and jointly determined juvenile justice case outcomes at intake and judicial disposition among males in one county juvenile court in the state of Iowa. Using an interpretation of the symbolic threat thesis and the emphasis on stereotyping as the theoretical framework, we discovered that being Black and older increased a youth’s chances of receiving an intake court referral and decreased the odds of participation in intake diversion. Age did not condition intake decision making for African Americans but was discovered to temper case outcomes for Whites. Although individual relationships were found, there was no evidence of joint race-age effects in decision making at judicial disposition.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?